I’ve watched too many teams spend more time explaining how to buy than building what matters.
In every corner of the world, someone has an idea that a token could help amplify, coordinate, or bring to life
A woman in Nairobi wants to launch a community rewards coin for her neighborhood co-op. A developer in Manila is building a micro-loan protocol but fears no one will figure out how to buy in. A climate activist in São Paulo is sitting on a regenerative finance concept that’s sat dormant, not because it isn’t good, but because getting users to “go on-chain” felt like too big an ask.
Vision is not scarce. The infrastructure to make vision accessible remains limited.
We talk a lot about “decentralization” and “permissionless innovation.” But let’s be honest: most people who dream of launching something on-chain don’t even try. The ideas are good. Yet the mechanics to participate feel stacked against them.
They look at the hoops: CEX listings, wallet setup, bridge risk, gas top-ups, and the associated costs. These barriers can make it feel as if the game is rigged and stacked against them. Then they quietly back away. The learning curve isn’t a curve. It’s a cliff.
When access is gated by complexity and the centralized reseller complex, the only ideas that reach markets are the ones backed by capital, time, or teams with technical expertise.
We lose users, entrepreneurs, inventors, and the millions of builders who might’ve launched a token if it were as simple as clicking “publish.”
It’s easy to say, “If they want it badly enough, they’ll figure it out.”
History tells us otherwise.
Crowdfunding was about raising funds and democratizing who gets to start. It gave artists, activists, and tinkerers a new path to bring their ideas to life. But over time, platforms got bloated. Payouts delayed. Discovery overwhelmed by algorithms. And slowly, the same friction that crowdfunding promised to remove crept back in.
It never scaled into the movement it could’ve been.
Why? Because intent doesn’t survive friction.
Now, on-chain assets stand at the same crossroads.
We’ve got the tools. We’ve got the capital. But we’re still asking users and builders alike to fight upstream against unnecessary complexity just to participate.
There’s a parallel here.
Before farm-to-table, small-scale farmers grew incredible produce, but the path to the plate was owned by middlemen. Distributors, wholesalers, supermarkets. The supply chain was optimized for scale, not connection.
Then something shifted.
We started caring about where our food came from. Farmers’ markets emerged. Restaurants built direct relationships with growers. Suddenly, a tomato was a story, a place, a person.
Farmers didn’t need to become marketers. The system evolved to make their product visible, accessible, and meaningful.
The same thing is about to happen with tokens.
Right now, launching a token is like growing organic vegetables in a world built for frozen TV dinners. The interfaces and infrastructure prioritizes scale over intent, voice, and value.
But that’s starting to change.
Here’s how the parallels stack up:
Food System | Token System |
|---|---|
Farmers grow produce | Entrepreneurs and Builders mint tokens |
Distributors and supermarkets control access | CEXs, and Traditional On-Ramps control access |
Farm-to-table creates direct access | Direct fiat payment rails bypass resellers and create native access paths |
Ingredients gain identity and meaning | Tokens carry purpose, intent, and community context |
Farmers didn’t need to become marketers | Projects teams shouldn’t need teach how-to-buy |
System evolved to support small-scale producers | Infrastructure is evolving to support earlier stage innovators |
It’s easy to flood the market with assets. We see it every day: thousands of tokens listed, barely touched.
What if a teacher in Jakarta could launch a learning token and their students could buy it with a single click?
What if a local green fund in Ghana could raise liquidity from their own community—without explaining how MetaMask works?
What if tokens could finally fulfill the promise of global, decentralized participation—not just in theory, but in practice?
This is what we’re building toward.
ONCHAIN®️ Ramp is more than a fiat-to-token tool. It’s the start of a global access layer, one that collapses the distance between intent and action.
No gas top-ups.
No bridge complexity.
No centralized listing barrier.
Just direct participation, instantly executable, across any cleared token and integrated chain.
The focus is unlocking economic agency for anyone, anywhere.
Because when friction disappears, creativity floods in. And when creators are given tools instead of obstacles, we stop talking about “adoption” and start seeing new economies emerge.
The old model told people to become an expert before they could belong.
We’re saying: you already belong. Let’s make it work.
We’re not alone in this vision. Builders across ecosystems are rallying toward the same goal—removing steps, minimizing risk, and amplifying clarity. What’s missing is a middle layer and interface that ties it all together.
That’s what OPN is for.
That’s what we’re here for.
I believe the next era of growth won’t come from the next “killer app.” It’ll come from the millions of quiet builders who finally get a clear path to launch.
Let’s build it for them.
Let’s build it with them.
Let’s build it with you.
<100 subscribers
Share Dialog
Jason Dominique
Support dialog
No comments yet